Stanford Digital Forma Urbis Romae Project

  • Home
  • Project
  • Map
  • Database
  • Slab Map
  • Glossary
  • Bibliography
  • People
  • Links

  • Page 370 of 1273
    Prev Next
     ID AND LOCATION
    Stanford # 194
    AG1980 # 194
    PM1960 # 194
    Slab # unknown
    Adjoins none

     CONDITION
    Located false
    Incised true
    Surviving true
    Subfragments 1
    Plaster Parts 0
    Back Surface smooth
    Slab Edges 1
    Clamp Holes 0
    Tassello no

     TECHNICAL INFO
    Scanner model15
    Search by:
    where value is:
    NOT
    AND OR
    Search by:
    where value is:
    NOT
     BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Photograph (73 KB)
    Note about photographs

    PM 1960 Plates: 41
    AG 1980 Plates: 42
     
    IDENTIFICATION
    non identified
    INSCRIPTION
    None

    3D Model Full model
    Download the viewer | Note about 3D models
    ANALYSIS
    [FRAGMENT ANALYSIS IN PROGRESS]

    Description One original edge on the left side of the fragment. In the left upper part two rows of rooms are separated by a rectangular space. These possibly continue on fragment 141ab. The corner of a structure is visible in the bottom left corner. The right half of the fragment is dominated by an open area.

    Identification: possible connection with 141ab The boundary incision matching algorithm conducted at Stanford proposed a possible match for fragments 194 and 141ab (Koller-Levoy 2005, 8, fig. 20). 5 pairs of corresponding incised linear features angling across the slab boundary resulted in a high matching score. Two of the matching sets of incisions were annotated as the front of a row of rooms, and another two as the back of a row of rooms; the fifth set of matching incisions, less definitive than the others, appears as if it may represent the border of a rectangular space. Though we have not yet researched potential placements on the wall for this hypothetical new fragment group, it contains a number of constraining elements useful for its possible positioning. Fragment 141 has a rough back surface and should fit into the corner of a slab, whereas fragment 194 has a smooth back and is only 38mm thick, so it must originate from an unusually thin slab.

    Significance

    HISTORY OF FRAGMENT
    None

    Stanford Graphics | Stanford Classics | Sovraintendenza ai Beni Culturali del Comune di Roma

    Copyright © The Stanford Digital Forma Urbis Romae Project