Identification: The Baths of L. Licinius Sura The fragment joins with frs. 21a, 21b (missing), and 21d to form the corner of a slab. The two clamp holes in the group (in frs. 21a and 21d) locate the ensemble precisely in the upper right corner of slab VII-14 (PM 1960, p. 79). This location is further confirmed by the inscription in this fragment and in the missing fr. 21b, which identifies the elongated building partially depicted here as the balneum Surae, a bathing complex known from the Regionary Catalogues to have been situated in Regio XIII, on the Aventine Hill. In the Regionary Catalogues, the bath is listed under the name thermas Surae/Syres, while an inscription discovered during the reconstruction of the Convent of Santa Sabina (CIL 6.40690) refers to it as the balneum Surae, the name also used on the Severan Plan (LTUR V, p. 65). L. Richardson also attributes the inscription CIL 6.1703, which mentions a cella tepidaria, to this complex although this thesis is not generally accepted (Richardson 1992, p. 396). According to ancient sources, the baths were built by L. Licinius Sura, friend of the emperor Trajan, or by Trajan in honor of his friend, and they were later restored by Gordian III (LTUR V, p. 65). Traditionally, the balneum Surae is associated with remains of a bath structure of Trajanic date uncovered north of the Via di Santa Prisca; and the large street running in front of the baths (visible here and in frs. 21b and d) is generally identified as the clivus Publicus, modern Via di Santa Prisca (LTUR V, p. 65; Richardson 1992, p. 396). A different proposal locates the complex to an area south of the Via di Santa Prisca, more precisely in the corner of Via di Santa Prisca and Via di Santa Sabina, where it would coincide with the remains of a bath structure of similar layout to what is depicted on the FUR fragments (LTUR V, p. 65).

As revealed by FUR fragment group 21, the bath complex consisted of a rectangular (?) structure, faced on the south by a row of outward-facing tabernae. An entrance at either end of the shops led to the bath area proper; the one furthest south was a double entrance, easily surveilled from a small guard room on the right. The entrances led to a large, L-shaped space surrounded on three sides by porticoes, probably functioning as the palaestra. In the N corner of the complex lay a series of interconnected bathing rooms, partially visible here, and a group of small, multi-storeyed rooms that probably functioned as the dressing and service area for that particular section of the baths (LTUR V, p. 65). The smaller L-shaped space seen in fr. 21a may have enclosed a natatio. On the S short side, the palaestra was flanked by another series of interconnected rooms. This section of the baths seems to have been accessible from the palaestra only via one small opening, and from the street via another small opening in the southernmost corner room. May this section have functioned as a separate bathing section designated for women? The layout of the balneum Surae complex is often compared to the Central Baths in Pompeii, which also featured bathing rooms surrounding a central palaestra and a facade lined with tabernae (LTUR V, p. 65; Richardson 1992, p. 396). The Pompeian structure did not, however, have a separate section for women.

Identification: Unidentified temple The structure in the lower third of this fragment is tentatively identified as a temple by the authors of PM 1960 (p. 79). It is difficult to understand the architectural layout of the structure as rendered here, but it seems to have consisted of a square cella surrounded by columns along the sides and in front and by a closed wall in the rear. Whether the entire structure was covered or not is uncertain.

Significance Fragment group 21 illustrates well how the size and layout of smaller neighborhood baths were adjusted to fit into the surrounding cityscape. L. Licinius Sura may have demolished a house or two to build this bathing establishment, but this pales in comparison to the entire neighborhood which his friend Trajan must have destroyed in order to construct his gargantuan thermae in the Subura (see thermae Traiani). The fragments witness the continued importance of smaller neighborhood baths throughout the Imperial period in Rome.

Text by Tina Najbjerg