Stanford Digital Forma Urbis Romae Project

  • Home
  • Project
  • Map
  • Database
  • Slab Map
  • Glossary
  • Bibliography
  • People
  • Links

  • Page 148 of 1273
    Prev Next
     ID AND LOCATION
    Stanford # 31mt
    AG1980 # 31m,t
    PM1960 # 31 m t
    Slab # V-12
    Adjoins 31il 31qrs

     CONDITION
    Located true
    Incised true
    Surviving false
    Slab Edges 0
    Clamp Holes 0
    Tassello no
    Search by:
    where value is:
    NOT
    AND OR
    Search by:
    where value is:
    NOT
     BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Detail from Cod. Vat. Lat. 3439 - Fo 19r,
    reproduced from PM 1960, pl. 9

    PM 1960 Plates: 9 29
    AG 1980 Plates: 23
     
    IDENTIFICATION
    Renaissance drawing: Theater of Marcellus (theatrum Marcelli)
    INSCRIPTION Epigraphic conventions used
  • Transcription
  • None; the fragments are lost
  • Renaissance Transcription
  • THEATRVM / MARCELLI
  • Reconstruction
  • THEATRVM / MARCELLI (PM 1960; AG 1980)
    ANALYSIS
    Description These two lost fragments appear in Renaissance drawing Cod. Lat. Vat. 3439 - Fo 19r (see photo detail above or PM 1960, pl. 9, no. 7) on either side of fr. 31r, which now is attached to frs. q and s. The drawing shows that the missing fragments depicted a wide platform with a frontal colonnade and a large semicircle at the back. At each end of the platform was an apsed room with three or five columns along each long side. In front of the platform two parallel lines were visible. The letters T*HEATRUM/M*ARCELLI were written in the spaces between those lines. Entry into the elongated space closest to the platform was restricted by a narrow opening in a crosswall. The bottom space terminated on the right in two curved lines.

    Identification: Theatrum Marcelli The inscription on these lost fragments (and on fr. 31r) identifies the platform as the stage of the Theater of Marcellus (PM 1960, pp. 91-92; AG 1980, p. 114). This stone theater, Rome's second, was begun by Julius Caesar and finished by Augustus, who named it in honor of his sister Octavia's son, Marcellus; it was inaugurated in 13 or 11 BCE. (LTUR V pp. 31-32). Part of the cavea of the theater is still standing, thanks to its conversion at an early stage into a fortress, then a castle, and finally a private residence for the Orsini family in 17th century. In the 1930's it was expropriated; shops were removed from its bottom arcade and abutting houses were torn down (LTUR V, p. 32). Excavations within the theater, Renaissance drawings, and the standing remains themselves demonstrate that the cavea consisted of three storeys; within each storey a complex system of radial corridors and staircases intersecting with annular walkways brought the spectators to and from their seats. Each storey was distinguished architecturally on the exterior of the cavea: the bottom arcade was open and had pilasters of the Doric order interspersed between the arches; the middle arcade was also open and was decorated in the Ionic order; the top section probably consisted of blind arches, embellished with pilasters of the Corinthian order (LTUR V, p. 34; Richardson 1992, p. 383).

    The architecture of the unusual stage building of the Theater of Marcellus is mainly known from these lost fragments and from frs. 31qrs. It consisted of a shallow, rectilinear scaenae frons with only a single colonnade as backdrop. It has been suggested that the four enormous columns which Augustus removed from the house of Scaurus were among the six central columns which fr. 31s shows were set back slightly from the rest of the colonnade (Richardson 1992, p. 382). As visible in these fragments, the stage was flanked on each side by apsidal and probably crossvaulted aulae. These opened up to the passageway that divided the stage from the cavea. The sides of the aulae were open and consisted of double rows of pilasters and columns (LTUR V, pp. 34-35). Recent excavations have revealed the pavement and a few of the pilasters and corresponding columns from the E aula (LTUR V, fig. 19). The excavations also unearthed traces of the Temple of Pietas which Caesar destroyed to make room for the theater; this suggests that the aulae were constructed at the same time as the rest of the theater (LTUR V, p. 35). Reconstructions based on the Marble Plan show a wall connecting the back of the two aulae; on the sides it runs parallel to the scaenae frons, then it extends towards the Tiber in a great semicircle, exactly as the Renaissance engraver of these fragments suggested (see reconstruction in PM 1960, p. 92). Excavations in 1999 revealed traces of this wall, which probably served as protection against flooding, and of the pavement within, thus confirming the unusual shape of the building as depicted on the Marble Plan (LTUR V, p. 35).

    Significance Together with fr. 31qrs, these missing fragments are key to our knowledge of the unusual architecture of the stage building of the Theater of Marcellus. Also significant is the fact that the Theater is located 30 meters too far to the west and has been turned 13° clockwise from its correct orientation on the Plan -- this represents one of the deformations in the topography on the Marble Plan which happened when the engravers mosaicked together the surveys of different sections of the city (Rodríguez-Almeida 1993).

    HISTORY OF FRAGMENT
    Like the majority of FUR fragments, these pieces were discovered in 1562 in a garden behind the Church of Saints Cosmas and Damian. From here, they were transferred to the Palazzo Farnese and stored there. Renaissance engravers reproduced the fragments in 16th-c. drawings that are now kept in the Vatican (for more information about the creation and accuracy of these drawings, see Cod. Vat. Lat. 3439), and Giovanni Pietro Bellori included them in his 1673 publication. The whereabouts of the fragments after this date are unknown. (The history of these fragments corresponds to Iter D as summarized in PM 1960, p. 56.)

    Text by Tina Najbjerg

    KEYWORDS
    theater, stage, apse, columns

    Stanford Graphics | Stanford Classics | Sovraintendenza ai Beni Culturali del Comune di Roma

    Copyright © The Stanford Digital Forma Urbis Romae Project