Stanford Digital Forma Urbis Romae Project

  • Home
  • Project
  • Map
  • Database
  • Slab Map
  • Glossary
  • Bibliography
  • People
  • Links

  • Page 1256 of 1273
    Prev Next
     ID AND LOCATION
    Stanford # ni737
    AG1980 # none
    PM1960 # none
    Slab # unknown
    Adjoins none

     CONDITION
    Located false
    Incised false
    Surviving true
    Subfragments 1
    Plaster Parts 0
    Back Surface smooth
    Slab Edges 0
    Clamp Holes 0
    Tassello no

     TECHNICAL INFO
    Scanner model15
    Search by:
    where value is:
    NOT
    AND OR
    Search by:
    where value is:
    NOT
     BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Photograph (46 KB)
    Note about photographs

    PM 1960 Plates: None
    AG 1980 Plates: None
     
    IDENTIFICATION
    Not incised
    INSCRIPTION
    None

    3D Model Full model
    Download the viewer | Note about 3D models
    ANALYSIS
    Description The fragment does not show any incisions or guidelines, but there are traces of red paint on the surface.

    Identification: Red-painted street? The straight, elongated shape of the piece is peculiar. Neither of the long, parallel sides is smooth enough to have been the edge of a slab, and there are no saw marks to indicate that the fragment was sawn into this form for reuse as a building tile in post-Roman periods. Certain clues may, however, explain its shape. Stanford experiments with breaking freshly incised slabs of marble show that slabs that are struck from the back with a heavy instrument (like a sledgehammer), tend to break along incised lines AND to break in lines that are perpendicular to the edge (click here to see photo essay on the experiment). It is thus highly likely that the slab or larger piece to which this fragment belonged was purposely broken into smaller bits, perhaps in Medieval times or perhaps in the 17th cent., when several FUR fragments were reused in the construction of the walls of the Secret Garden of the Farnese Palace. The blow made the slab or large fragment break along two closely parallel lines that probably were perpendicular to a slab edge. The red pigment visible in this fragment and the fact that certain streets on the Plan were painted red (see especially the recently discovered fr. fn9) indicate that these two parallel lines delineated a red-painted street.

    Significance The red pigment and elongated shape of this fragment are significant. If our thesis that the shape of the piece is caused by incisions that delineated a street is correct, the notion that several streets on the Plan were painted red for emphasis must be considered.

    This database includes the first public presentation of 394 blank fragments from the Plan--they are not catalogued or illustrated in either of the two fundamental publications, PM 1960 and AG 1980. Because there are no incisions to guide scholars, the blank fragments have so far not played any role in attempts to put the Plan back together. Digital 3D matching may now allow blank parts of the Plan to be reconstructed together with incised areas.

    HISTORY OF FRAGMENT
    Blank fragments were not kept during the early centuries of the Marble Plan's rediscovery (PM 1960, p. 163). Surviving pieces like this one may have come from excavations done since 1867, although its unusual shape (as explained above) may indicate that it was one of the pieces that was found in the 16th cent. and subsequently reused in the construction of the walls of the Secret Garden of the Farnese Palace.

    Text by Tina Najbjerg and Jennifer Trimble.


    Stanford Graphics | Stanford Classics | Sovraintendenza ai Beni Culturali del Comune di Roma

    Copyright © The Stanford Digital Forma Urbis Romae Project