ID AND LOCATION
| Stanford #
| 31a |
| AG1980 #
| 31a |
| PM1960 #
| 31 a |
| Slab #
| V-12 |
| Adjoins
| 31b 31c |
CONDITION
| Located
| true |
| Incised
| true |
| Surviving
| true |
| Subfragments
| 1 |
| Plaster Parts
| 0 |
| Back Surface
| smooth |
| Slab Edges
| 1 |
| Clamp Holes
| 0 |
| Tassello
| no | TECHNICAL INFO
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- AG 1980, p. 114, pl. 23
- PM 1960, pp. 91-93, pl. 29
- LTUR I: Centum Gradus (E. Rodríguez-Almeida), p. 259; Saxum Tarpeium (T. P. Wiseman), pp. 237-238; Capitolium (Republik und Kaiserzeit) (C. Reusser), pp. 232-234
- Richardson 1992, pp. 68-70 (Capitolium Mons), p. 80 (Centum Gradus), pp. 377-78 (Tarpeia Rupes)
|
|
|
|
|
| ANALYSIS
|
| Description A double line bisects this fragment from upper left to lower right. At left are visible the corners of two buildings, their walls outlined and recessed. This is typical of the representation of temples on the Plan, and examination of this fragment together with frs. 31c and 31b (now lost), shows that two temples were indeed represented here. The larger temple (at top left in the color photograph) is known mainly through the Renaissance drawing (see fr. 31b or PM 1960, pl. 10). A broad flight of four steps led up to the podium temple; only two of its frontal columns were drawn, but their spacing suggests a hexastyle temple. Inside the cella, along the back wall, this fragment shows a rectangular feature that was probably a base for the cult statue. The smaller, tetrastyle temple (whose back corner is visible at top center on the color photograph) was similarly frontal and built on a podium, although much narrower in proportions. Its four frontal columns (visible on fr. 31c) are depicted as dots within squares, which may mean that the columns stood on plinths. A broad flight of stairs is visible in front of them, but the individual steps are not carved. A double line outlines the cella walls; the back wall includes an outward curve that would have formed a niche for the cult statue inside.
On the other side of the double line are parts of two flights of an external staircase, a landing adjacent to them, and additional irregular spaces below. Examination together with frs. 31b and 31c provides more information. The two flights of stairs double back on one another with the landing at the hairpin turn. The features depicted with a double line along the side of each flight suggests that these are retaining walls on the uphill side of the staircases, and that the temples therefore stood at the top of the hill. Each flight alternates between groups of horizontal, parallel lines and unlined areas; these must be clusters of steps separated by short ramps. On the upper flight, following the direction of the staircase, are two long and narrow rectangles along the outside of the staircase, joined by a concave line that crosses the staircase. This is the standard way of representing an arch on the Plan (note that the Renaissance drawing of fr. 31b shows the entire arch: PM 1960, pl. 10). At the bottom right of this fragment are several irregularly-shaped spaces. These are separated from the open space to the left--the plateau at the top of the slope--by a double line which represents the upper retaining wall. These irregular spaces must therefore slope down quite steeply; they may represent gardens or other kinds of space on the steep slopes of the hill.
Identification: Centum gradus? Fragments 31a, 31b and 31c were positioned on this slab by L. Cozza on the basis of the thickness of the slab, the vein in the marble, and fr. 31a's position at the edge of slab (PM 1960, p. 91). Given this position on the Plan, these fragments must represent a complex of ramps and stairs on the SW slope of the Capitoline Hill. It has been argued that this is the centum gradus (one hundred steps), which was located below the Tarpeian Rock (Tac. Hist. 3.71; PM 1960, p. 91). However, this identification depends on the Tarpeian Rock having been at the SW corner of the Capitoline; given the ancient evidence that the Rock overlooked the Forum, this is not at all certain (LTUR I, pp. 237-238). The double lines that separate the two flights of stairs and that border the upper flight are retaining walls rising up from each flight. At the bottom of the hill, this system of stairs and ramps surely led to one of the gates in the republican walls, but it is not certain which one. (E. Rodríguez-Almeida has suggested that this was the archaic porta Carmentalis: LTUR I, p. 259). It will have formed an important passageway between the Capitoline and the markets and monuments below, including the Forum Holitorium, the Circus Flaminius and its surrounding victory temples, the Theater of Marcellus, and the riverfront.
Identification: Temples on the Capitoline hill The two temples depicted here stood on the SW corner of the Capitoline at the top of the flights of stairs. It is not known which of the Capitoline's many temples they represent.
Significance These fragments of the Forma Urbis--31a, 31b, 31c and
499--are unique evidence for the ancient organization of this portion of the Capitoline. The fragments contribute valuable information about the relationship and movement between the Capitoline and the important sector of the city just below its SW slopes. These fragments also provide our only surviving evidence for three otherwise unknown temples on the Capitoline, one of which may be the Temple of Fides (see fr. 499). |
|
| HISTORY OF FRAGMENT |
| Like the majority of FUR fragments, this piece was discovered in 1562 in a garden behind the Church of Saints Cosmas and Damian. From here, it was transferred to the Palazzo Farnese and stored there. Renaissance engravers reproduced the fragment in 16th-c. drawings that are now kept in the Vatican (Cod. Vat. Lat. 3439), and Giovanni Pietro Bellori included it in his 1673 publication. The fragment was later used as building material in the 17th-c. construction of the Farnese family's Giardino Segreto (Secret Garden) near the Via Giulia, and was rediscovered in 1888 or 1898 when the walls of the garden were demolished. The Commissione Archeologica stored the piece until 1903, when curators of the Capitoline Museums included it in a reconstruction of the FUR mounted on a wall behind the Palazzo dei Conservatori (1903-1924). Since then, the fragment has been stored with the other known FUR fragments in various places: the storerooms of the Antiquarium Comunale (1924-1939), the Capitoline Museums again (1939-1955), the Palazzo Braschi (1955-1998), and since 1998 in the Museo della Civiltà Romana in EUR under the auspices of the Sovraintendenza ai Beni Culturali del Comune di Roma. (This fragment's history corresponds to Iter C as summarized in PM 1960, p. 56.) The fragment was more complete in the Renaissance: Cod.Vat.Lat. 3439, fo 2 r shows a much larger fragment comprising 31a, 31b (now lost), and 31c (see PM 1960, pl. 10).
Text by Tina Najbjerg and Jennifer Trimble |
|
| KEYWORDS
|
| steps, temples, Capitoline |
|